Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +749%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
7680
96
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy