NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+615%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4000M
94
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2028%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro K4000M
20
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1255%
271
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
960
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
