NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+207%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4000M
94
Quadro K5200
+211%
293
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK110B
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
