NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
+5%
1.084 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF110
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
