Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 +1404%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU102
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy