NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+100%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
