NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
+89%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK107
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
