Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G71
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy