NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+822%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU102
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
