NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
+54%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM107
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
