NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+203%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.175
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
