NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
15808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+6862%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
16384
48
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
