NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
+312%
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2496
40
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
