NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1575%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
640
Shading Units
5888
40
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
