NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X
+173%
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2688
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
