Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1770MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +655%
10.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy