Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +6156%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
12W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy