NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA GRID K520
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
GRID K520
+198%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GK104
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
