NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1409%
8.637 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
30
RTX A2000 Mobile
+3973%
1222
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
RTX A2000 Mobile
+600%
84
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
