NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
10368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+5181%
38.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
384
Shading Units
10752
32
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
