NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (51W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
+28%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
