NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
A10M
+3097%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
7168
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
