NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe
+4161%
31.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
384
Shading Units
9216
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
