NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c
+588%
5.046 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
245W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK180
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
