Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +645%
5.468 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net