NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (47W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
+158%
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
