NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
+223%
2.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
