NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
+128%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
