NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
+11%
1.151 TFLOPS
Tesla M2070
1.03 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF100
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
