NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K1100M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 134W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 44.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1100M
+135%
0.542 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
44.80GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
384
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.648 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
22.59 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
542.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
22.59 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
134W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
