NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K1100M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 78W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 44.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1100M
+93%
0.542 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
44.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
112
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.648 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
22.59 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
542.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
22.59 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
