NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro GV100
+372%
16.66 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Volta
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1132 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
848 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
868.4GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
2496
320
TMUs
208
128
ROPs
40
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
208.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
520.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
33.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
8.330 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GK110
GV100-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
