NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro GV100
+627%
16.66 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Volta
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1132 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
848 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
868.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1536
320
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
208.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
520.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
33.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
8.330 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GK104
GV100-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
