NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
+905%
10.34 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
14
3584
Shading Units
448
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
238W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP100
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
