NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
+376%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
122W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.0
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
