NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
+853%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP100
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.0
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
