NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100
+1310%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.0
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
