NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
GRID K1
+181%
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GK107
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
