NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
+2133%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
108
240
Shading Units
6912
80
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
189W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
