NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+57796%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
3.680 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
29.44 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
38W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
