NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+1480%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
128
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
171W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GA107S
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
