Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +2285%
8.253 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
20
128
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GA107S
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
Unknown
484 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net