NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 210W)
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 19 years late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2004
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
60
-
Shading Units
7680
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
210W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
NV43
GPU Name
AD103
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
