Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +1083%
5.468 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net