NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1769%
8.637 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
95W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
