NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
13120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+9696%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
13312
64
TMUs
832
24
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
