NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
+23%
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
