NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
+1676%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
