NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
14144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+9519%
44.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
14336
64
TMUs
896
24
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
