NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+1342%
6.664 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
